BMW M3 Forum
BMW M3 Forum BMW M3 Gallery BMW M3 Reviews BMW M3 Social Groups BMW M3 Chat M3Forum Sponsors >>
Loading


Mobile M3forum
Go Back   BMW M3 Forum.com (E30 M3 | E36 M3 | E46 M3 | E92 M3 | F80/X) > BMW M3 Discussions > E90 M3 (Sedan) | E92 M3 (Coupe) | E93 M3 (Convert) (2008-2013)
Tire Rack Buy Winter Tires Now!
Not a member? Register Now!
Register Gallery All AlbumsBlogs Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar FAQ

E90 M3 (Sedan) | E92 M3 (Coupe) | E93 M3 (Convert) (2008-2013) {Engine: S65 - Max Hp: 414 hp (420 hp Euro) at 8,300 rpm / 295 lb/ft at 3,900 rpm}

Like us on Facebook
M3forum Sponsor ListInterested in Becoming an M3forum sponsor?  Click here

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mon, Jul-04-2011, 04:51:36 PM   #81
stefan_
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 56
In the garage:
Reputation: 0 stefan_ is on a distinguished road
Location: Calgary

Canada




Default Re: S54 vs S65 weight differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilmar13 View Post
I hope you guys acting like E9x fanboys are just trolling, and don’t seriously think weight is not the most important factor regarding handling dynamics… If you believe a 3700 lb 414hp car would even be able to lap the same tight road course as a 2700 lb with 300HP (same power to weight) let alone a 2700 lb car with 414hp, you are yet one more person reinforcing the general perception that M3 drivers are clueless douches. Maybe you should take your whip to a track day and get your ass handed to you by an ancient (designed in the 1950’s!) Lotus 7 with half your HP, or even a decent driver in a stock Miata. Go back to seeing how fast you can take the overpass and reading Motortrend, and stop poo-pooing a thread discussing something you don’t understand… there are plenty of threads on here about carbon fiber trim and stereo upgrades for you to stay occupied. Yes the E9x is a newer car, congratulations captain obvious. As to why that has anything to do with taking the motor out of it and putting it in a lighter more agile platform, is beyond me.
Whew.. 3 pages in and finally.. thank you. E92 vs E46 really comes down to choice. I just sold my E46 for an E92 simply because I wanted to customize a new vehicle with specifications I wasn't able to find in a used one. I think they are cool.. that's about it. E46 is a lot cheaper.

As for the swap, I would do it only for the fun of doing a swap, that's about it.
Jump to top stefan_ is offline  
Sponsored Links
Register now and remove these ads
Old Mon, Jul-04-2011, 05:58:20 PM   #82
Dizzeep
His fever is yellow!!!
 
Dizzeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,175
In the garage:
Reputation: 0 Dizzeep is on a distinguished road
Location: Eugene,OR/Austin,TX

India




Default Re: S54 vs S65 weight differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricSMG View Post
This thread was extremely frustrating to read... lots of baseless opinions based on "theory" when half the people haven't even driven the current model.

The new car is faster than the 46M, in every measurable criteria, end of story. Yeah, it weighs a little more, but it's all RELATIVE people. The wieght delta is roughly the same as the delta between the 36 and 46.... except that the 46 offers no real handling advantage over the 36 while the E9X flat kills the 46 in the handling dept., but you 46M fanboys conveniently overlook this. Stop bitching (or clinging to, rather) about how heavy it is. If you don't like it, fine, but for the love of God accept the performance facts and freaking appreciate what a fine automobile it is.

After all, it's an M3. It kicks ass. It's the model we all (should) love.
well said. in a perfect forum world this thread would die... highly doubt that it will though.
__________________

My M3 Journal


///M:TMS Pulley Kit, Dr.Vanos Upgrade,M-track Mode Retro-code,Dinan Exhaust,Status Gruppe Tuning Resonated Section 2 X-pipe, Evolve-R Tune
Major Aesthetics:SGT front lip,angel eyes,dynavin V5,CSL diffuser,stromwerkes SMG knob,grey alcantera SMG shift boot, badge,DDM tuning 6000k fogs
Jump to top Dizzeep is online now  
Old Fri, Jul-08-2011, 02:11:07 AM   #83
opey
Registered User
 
opey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,764
Reputation: 0 opey is on a distinguished road
Location: Long Island

United States




Default Re: S54 vs S65 weight differences

god there's a lot of idiotic s$hit in this thread
__________________

04 IR/IR 6spd
sold =(
Jump to top opey is offline  
Old Tue, Jul-12-2011, 02:47:34 PM   #84
donnatronious
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 416
Reputation: 0 donnatronious is on a distinguished road
Location: Dallas

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by little lai View Post
what is that supposed to mean
Explains how a gtr can outhandle an e46 m3 when it weighs more, get it?
__________________
"I heel-toe therefore I am..."
"Yes I'm stretched and poked. No, college is for losers"
2003 Tiag/Red 3 pedals - Under Construction
2007 S2000 Grand Prix White on Black/Red Interior - KW V3 - Direzza Star Specs 225/45ZR17, 255/40ZR17 - T1R Forged Halfshaft Spacers - CR interior bits
Jump to top donnatronious is offline  
Old Tue, Jul-12-2011, 03:14:56 PM   #85
drunk hal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,004
Reputation: 0 drunk hal will become famous soon enough

United States




Default Re: S54 vs S65 weight differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmihld View Post
All things being equal, weight has nothing to do with handling capability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by donnatronious View Post
Explains how a gtr can outhandle an e46 m3 when it weighs more, get it?
Uh no, the post I quoted says "All things being equal..." AWD vs. RWD plus gobs more horsepower and more modern suspension design does not mean all things equal. ****ing clown shoes, you're wearing them.
Jump to top drunk hal is online now  
Old Tue, Jul-12-2011, 03:40:54 PM   #86
wilmar13
Registered User
 
wilmar13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 37
Posts: 550
In the garage:
Reputation: 0 wilmar13 is on a distinguished road
Location: Charlotte

United States




Default Re: S54 vs S65 weight differences

I think the actual intent of the thread was answered as the S65 being about 33lbs lighter than the S54 apples to apples due to the long cast iron block vs Al block of the S65.

Still have not seen anyone plop it in something else though, which would be really cool. Maybe in a few more years it will be more popular/viable, just like putting an S54 in an E36 is now.

Last edited by wilmar13; Tue, Jul-12-2011 at 03:52:59 PM. Reason: removed potentially inflamatory wording
Jump to top wilmar13 is offline  
Old Tue, Jul-12-2011, 07:00:50 PM   #87
donnatronious
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 416
Reputation: 0 donnatronious is on a distinguished road
Location: Dallas

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by little lai View Post
Uh no, the post I quoted says "All things being equal..." AWD vs. RWD plus gobs more horsepower and more modern suspension design does not mean all things equal. ****ing clown shoes, you're wearing them.
You are intentionally interpreting his statement in a fashion which allows you to argue the obvious. Really cool, please continue.
__________________
"I heel-toe therefore I am..."
"Yes I'm stretched and poked. No, college is for losers"
2003 Tiag/Red 3 pedals - Under Construction
2007 S2000 Grand Prix White on Black/Red Interior - KW V3 - Direzza Star Specs 225/45ZR17, 255/40ZR17 - T1R Forged Halfshaft Spacers - CR interior bits
Jump to top donnatronious is offline  
Old Tue, Jul-12-2011, 07:13:28 PM   #88
drunk hal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,004
Reputation: 0 drunk hal will become famous soon enough

United States




Default Re: S54 vs S65 weight differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by donnatronious View Post
You are intentionally interpreting his statement in a fashion which allows you to argue the obvious. Really cool, please continue.
Speaking of what is obvious...no matter how you slice it, handling is affected by weight. Or are you taking the position that extra weight can be masked through drivetrain layout, increasing power? Either way, it should be obvious what is true. Go find someone else to troll.

Last edited by drunk hal; Tue, Jul-12-2011 at 07:17:24 PM.
Jump to top drunk hal is online now  
Old Tue, Jul-12-2011, 07:26:45 PM   #89
Rez
.
 
Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,237
Reputation: 637 Rez has a reputation beyond reputeRez has a reputation beyond reputeRez has a reputation beyond reputeRez has a reputation beyond reputeRez has a reputation beyond reputeRez has a reputation beyond repute
Location: Philly





Default Re: S54 vs S65 weight differences

Since the question was answered this thread is now closed for obvious reasons
Jump to top Rez is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
differences, s54, s65, weight

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
M3Forum.com and M3forum.net is in no way sponsored, endorsed or affiliated by or with BMW NA / BMW AG or any of it's subsidiaries or vendors.
BMW and M3 (E90 M3 | E92 M3 | E93 M3 | E46 M3 | E36 M3 | E30 M3) are registered trademarks of BMW AG.
M3Forum Terms of Service
Copyright ©1999-2012 M3Forum.com
One of the largest message boards on the web !
Discussing S54 vs S65 weight differences in the E90 M3 (Sedan) | E92 M3 (Coupe) | E93 M3 (Convert) (2008-2013) Forum - {Engine: S65 - Max Hp: 414 hp (420 hp Euro) at 8,300 rpm / 295 lb/ft at 3,900 rpm} at BMW M3 Forum.com (E30 M3 | E36 M3 | E46 M3 | E92 M3 | F80/X)