![]() |
|
Loading
|
Mobile M3forum |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
| M3 Track: Racing and DE Best mod for speed is learning to get the most out of what you currently have. Tracks and DE's is the place to start! |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered troublemaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 449
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Las Vegas
![]() |
My Ohlins could be true rear coilovers.
__________________
'02 M3, Imola/Black, 6MT, CWP, PP, xenons, no sunroof, swapped ft. strut hats, Bimmerworld radiator and oil cooler, Ohlin struts/shocks, Eibach pro kit, PFC DD Rotors, PFC pads (Z or 06, depends...), Hybrid Audio Technologies Clarus speakers up front, two HAT Legatia 8's in rear deck, two big amps in the trunk for increased downforce... ![]() '11 E90 M3, Mebourne/Black/Fox Red/Black, 6MT, roof, PP2, heated seats, bone stock |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
|
You guys with the rear coilovers, how did you reinforce the shock mounts? Is there a solution that doesn't involve a full cage? I hear they are prone to tearing as is. Seems it would be a much bigger problem if they also have to hold the weight of the car...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
If it ain't lightweight, it ain't the right weight.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,002
In the garage:
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: LA/OC/SD
![]() |
I'm running full rear coilovers, made my Intrax. I'm using z3 reinforcement plates.
__________________
Current: 1969 Ford Mustang Coupe; 351w (5.8L) carb engine; Champion 4 row radiator; Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake Manifold; Edelbrock 750 CFM Carb; 15" Cragar Wheels; 215/60-15 front tires, 255/60-15 rear tires; Doug Tri-Y Headers; Custom 2.5" Dual Side Exit Exhaust w/Xpipe; MSD 6AL; Electric Fuel Pump; March Performance U/D Pulley Set; Monte Carlo Bar; 3200 lbs. ![]() 1995 M3; single 3" exhaust after cats; CF hood; Apex ARC-8 17x9" wheels; Conti DW 245 square; BC Racing Coilovers. SOLD: E46 M3 SMG; Intrax coilovers; ACPT CF DS; SS V1 Headers/Section 1; Zionsville Type 17 kit; VAC Ultra light pulley set; BMW MS 4.10; Evolve-R Tune; 2980 lbs.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,487
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: San Jose
![]() |
from all my discussions with race shops and my local MCS shop that i bought my setup from, the main difference you get is that the rear springs become more "efficient" in a rear coilover setup, so you end up using less spring relative to the oem positioning. i would be surprised if anyone of us (myself included) would be able to hop into a car and feel any difference.
__________________
2004 CB 6 Speed ///M3 Motion Control :: Performance Friction :: Autosolution :: Ground Control :: Mason :: APEX Looking For :: SS Race ::
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I brake for tailgaters
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 381
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: wretched hive of scum and villainy
![]() |
I don't buy the argument that the horizontal forces generated by the arcing spring motion contributes much to the body damage at the subframe mount. My WAG is a lot more force is generated by accelerating/decelerating or by turning hard on some really sticky tires.
If you are really concerned that the springs are a problem, you can try the GC weight jacks instead of rear coilovers. The lower spring perch articulates, so the spring compresses closer to a linear motion. Not as ideal as rear coilovers, but significantly less expensive. I assume those numbers listed for wheel rate are for E9x. The wheel rate for E46 is something like 0.44 for stock spring location. For us mere mortals, you're probably right. I'm sure it's very easy for a pro in a car with high spring rates and solid bushings everywhere. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
HellaFunctional
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,782
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: So. Cal
![]() |
Interesting read. Thanks for sharing
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
E46 M3 | E90 M3
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,258
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Chicago
![]() |
Great information and interesting read.
I personally plan on going to a true rear coilover sometime in the future when I get a more track focused set of dampers. I am personally just waiting for a certain damper to release to the market before I make my decision. Some people brought up reinforcing the rear. I have exchanged several emails with Lex at Motion Control Suspension. He specifically told me that the risk of tearing shock towers is overly exaggerated. According to him, a simple reinforcement plate and rear strut bar should suffice, even for a car that's daily driven. I have exchanged messages and emails with countless people throughout the world asking the same question. No one has ever had any tears after tens of thousands of miles. And of we all know that the real reason to get a full rear coilover in the back is make adjusting height a lot easier ![]()
__________________
![]() 2002 E46 M3 6MT | Jet Black . Black Nappa | My E46 M3 Build Thread 2009 E90 M3 DCT | Melbourne Red . Speed Cloth | My E90 M3 Build Thread LIKE IT: Zima Motorsports . Dean's Performance POST YOUR DYNO GRAPH HERE: The Official Dyno Thread |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
MCLA
|
Actually, to adjust height my weight jacks make extremely easy. Jack up car from diff, ratchet & socket, bam! No collars, no wheel removal, extremely easy.
__________________
MCLUB | Los Angeles |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,310
In the garage:
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Hawaii
![]() |
Great info here, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Sydney, Australia
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|