![]() |
|
Loading
|
Mobile M3forum |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
| E46 M3 (2001-2006) Engine: S54 - Max Hp: 333 hp at 7,900 rpm / 262 lb/ft at 4,900 rpm Total Produced: 45,000+ - Years Produced: 2001 to 2006. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
|
If the motor didn't shut off when the smoke appeared (post apocolypse) and there wasn't any noise or warning lights, what are the chances I didn't contact any valves or anything?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
|
http://www.m3forum.net/m3forum/showt...post1065358457
It is my opinion that the cam gear bolt failure is not due to material failure but that they become loose for some reason and this causes the cam gear to grind against the bolt threads. Over time this sawing action leads to the bolts shearing. Why the bolts become loose is the million dollar question. Perhaps it's an improper torque setting on one of the engine builder's torque wrench? That would explain why some engines never experience a bolt failure while others are affected relatively early in their service life. Bottom line: Inspect for loose cam gear bolts whenever you have the valve cover off. If they are loose, replace them, ideally with the original part number. If they are not loose, leave them intact. ![]()
__________________
Do you wish that Double VANOS never existed? Vote! 2004 Silver Gray/Black M3 Convertible |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,297
Reputation: 0
![]() ![]() |
Last edited by drunk hal; Tue, Jul-24-2012 at 03:45:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 452
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: East Bay
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
![]() 2006 M3 ZCP Tiag AA Gen 6 ~ KWV1 ~ Custom DME w/CSL SMG ~ ST60 *CURRENT*2001 S2000 W/F22 - Full Race GT30/J's Racing/Mugen/WORK XSA/AEM EMS 395RWHP 274TQ *SOLD* |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
BSME
|
No, no, I wasn't trying to argue with your or your point.. maybe I chose the wrong smiley, sorry about that. Just pointing out that these bolts, new or old, definitely have problems.
Your point is valid, but doesn't really pertain to the catastrophic vanos failures at all. Most, if not all, of the problems of this nature that I have seen have been to cars that have been well maintained. Obviously the engine is going to be better off with routine maintenance, but even if it is maintained to the teeth, it doesn't seem to prolong or prevent these catastrophic failures.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
|
Ok... UPDATE:
We towed it over to Kelly BMW from IPS Motorsports to have the diagnosis done there. We got as far as taking the valve cover off and there is a tooth missing from the cam and broken bits from the tensioner and guide. The IPS techs are fairly certain the chain jumped and the motor lost time which would bend the valves and basically destroy the inside of the motor. Had some calls with BMWNA and they are waiting on the diagnosis from Kelly so we can "see how they can help." Keeping my fingers crossed at the moment until they tear into it. Hopefully BMW does the right thing. :/ Sure would go a long way down the road when it's time for the next one. |
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
BSME
|
Quote:
good luck to you sir
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,297
Reputation: 0
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 292
Reputation: 0
![]() ![]() |
sucks dude. Serious design failure...no wonder the e92 didnt have a vanos
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
|
So there is PLENTY of talk about VANOS failures that result from the tabs breaking off or the cam gear bolts shearing... but how many of these are caught and how many result in a destroyed motor? Anybody have any ideas?
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|