[Jonny Midnight]

Originally Posted by P4lm3r

Acshully I posted this fread here on purpose. See how you are actually getting honest views from both sides? It works!

How many retards have posted?

[SteDevote]

Originally Posted by Jonny Midnight

How many retards have posted?

[Dark Apostle]

Originally Posted by Porshapwr

As I said above, I'm going on studies that I've read. I'm no expert by any means. In the instance you mentioned, that may be beyond the morality that's inherent. The "need" for the toy overwhelmed their inherent morality and so they did what they needed to to get it. That is where solid moral teachings would come in.

Just a thought........

That is the reason I also figured would cause a child to behave that way. The "moral strength" wasn't enough to prevent the bad behavior. By the way do watch "Moral Oral"?

But back on topic, i see this as a huge issue when it comes to first amendment rights as well as a violation of church and state, in that the state is overstepping it's limits. I should have the right to start an organization and talk about how much i hate another group. You may not like it, but I'm not violating anyone's rights.

[SteDevote]

Originally Posted by Porshapwr

It's a good question and one that I'm not qualified to answer. I'm just going on what I've read on the topic - the hows and whys are up for debate but I believe it was Palmer that said in some words Evolution would have played a role and I would probably agree with that. It sure would make for a good study.

Perhaps like the opposable thumbs. Just happened?

I just googled "a priori knowledge".

I think your answer might be in there.

From your perspective it has to be evolution plus some philosophical reason for its existence. Like I said, .

Thanks for humoring my attempt to see the world as you see it.

[SteDevote]

Originally Posted by Dark Apostle

That is the reason I also figured would cause a child to behave that way. The "moral strength" wasn't enough to prevent the bad behavior. By the way do watch "Moral Oral"?

But back on topic, i see this as a huge issue when it comes to first amendment rights as well as a violation of church and state, in that the state is overstepping it's limits. I should have the right to start an organization and talk about how much i hate another group. You may not like it, but I'm not violating anyone's rights.

The point is not to stay on topic here.

[Porshapwr]

Originally Posted by Dark Apostle

That is the reason I also figured would cause a child to behave that way. The "moral strength" wasn't enough to prevent the bad behavior. By the way do watch "Moral Oral"?

But back on topic, i see this as a huge issue when it comes to first amendment rights as well as a violation of church and state, in that the state is overstepping it's limits. I should have the right to start an organization and talk about how much i hate another group. You may not like it, but I'm not violating anyone's rights.

Agreed.

Originally Posted by SteDevote

Perhaps like the opposable thumbs. Just happened?

I just googled "a priori knowledge".

I think your answer might be in there.

From your perspective it has to be evolution plus some philosophical reason for its existence. Like I said, .

Thanks for humoring my attempt to see the world as you see it.

I'm watching you!