![]() |
|
Loading
|
Mobile M3forum |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
| E36 M3 (1992-1999) {Euro - S50 B32 321hp @ 7400 rpm} {U.S. - S52 B32 240 hp @ 6000 rpm} Total Produced: 71,212 - Years Produced: 1992 to 1999 |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 32
Posts: 696
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Gulf Coast
![]() |
is it true what i am reading? 3.23:1?
it feels like 4:10
__________________
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,480
Reputation: 0
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
95 3.15 96+ 3.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Negative Elitist Bastard
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 43
Posts: 3,568
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: HB
|
There were four different transmissions used on 3.2-liter M3s. European-spec models have a Getrag six-speed manual transmission with the following ratios: 4.23 (1), 2.51 (2), 1.67 (3), 1.23 (4), 1.00 (5), .83 (6). This same gearbox was later used (with the same ratios) as the internals of the Sequential M Gearbox (SMG).
The North American-spec 3.2-liter E36 M3 retains the ZF Type C five-speed manual gearbox of the 3.0-liter version, with the same internal ratios: 4.20 (1), 2.49 (2), 1.66 (3), 1.24 (4), 1.00 (5). Starting with the 1997 model year, the ZF 5HP18 five-speed automatic returned as an option with the same internal ratios used on the 3.0-liter model: 3.67 (1), 2.00 (2), 1.41 (3), 1.00 (4), .74 (5). All 3.2-liter M3s equipped with a manual gearbox (including SMG) use a shorter 3.23:1 final drive and limited slip differential. North American-spec M3s with the ZF five-speed automatic transmission have an even shorter 3.38:1 rear end, also with limited slip. In addition, all 3.2-liter North American-spec E36 M3s are equipped with Automatic Stability Control plus Traction (ASC+T) which can apply the brakes and/or reduce engine power in order to maintain traction. It includes an orange warning light under the M logo in the instrument cluster and can be switched off via a console-mounted button. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Blessed with M Power...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 204
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: College Station, TX
|
Well, im assuming your comparing your car to another manufactured car. The M3 uses high transmission ratios and a low final drive ratio. Where other cars can have the same total ratio because they have the opposite gearing. you have to look at the total ratio when comparing cars.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 32
Posts: 696
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Gulf Coast
![]() |
okay totally understood, but what if i want to build up my engine? Get it to about say 400 to 500 hp? you know like adding a super charger + internals. wouldnt it be wise to change out to a better gear ratio?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 616
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Arlington, VA
|
word has it anything much over 400 hp is not cheap or especially easy....you might be happy with 400 hp and changing your ratio...
__________________
98 M3 Sedan, Cosmos Black /// Alpine head unit, JL Audio Sub, Xtant Amp, MB Quart component front spkrs /// UUC Clutch stop /// Axxis Ultimates /// Rogue RSMs /// Powerflex RTABs |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 32
Posts: 696
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Gulf Coast
![]() |
yea thats what i am speaking of, but which ratio is recommended for motors putting out over 400 hp
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
#56 JP M3
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 29
Posts: 4,986
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Dallas TX
![]() |
for a s/c car? 3.64 or 3.46.
turbo? 3.15 or 3.23.
__________________
Sean
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 32
Posts: 696
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Gulf Coast
![]() |
then how come corvette and z28 drivers say i should go to 4:10...probably because i drive a bmw, they dotn know any better lol
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,702
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: St. Louis, MO
![]() |
Quote:
Our 5th gear ratio is 1:1. That is usually the 4th gear on most transmissions. A turbo car can benefit from a taller than stock ratio because it lets the car build and stay in the boost longer.
__________________
1996 ///M3 Boston Green / Modena, Lux package, sunroofless, factory wing 2001 Honda S2000 |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The benefits of a shorter gear ratio in the E46 M3 | Divexxtreme | M3 Track: Racing and DE | 46 | Sat, May-17-2008 01:32:47 PM |
| gear ratio questian | youlost | E36 M3 (1992-1999) | 5 | Fri, Jan-13-2006 05:38:44 PM |
| gear ratio | cougarslammer | E36 M3 (1992-1999) | 3 | Tue, Aug-30-2005 02:25:34 AM |
| 4.10 gear ratio | mpowr3 | E46 M3 (2001-2006) | 2 | Wed, Mar-16-2005 12:16:33 AM |
| 3.91 Differential Ratio Gear 1/4 time | Tiago | E46 M3 (2001-2006) | 12 | Wed, Dec-03-2003 05:57:09 PM |