BMW M3 Forum
BMW M3 Forum BMW M3 Gallery BMW M3 Reviews BMW M3 Social Groups BMW M3 Chat M3Forum Sponsors >>
Loading


Mobile M3forum
Go Back   BMW M3 Forum.com (E30 M3 | E36 M3 | E46 M3 | E92 M3 | F80/X) > BMW M3 Discussions > E36 M3 (1992-1999)
Tire Rack Buy Winter Tires Now!
Not a member? Register Now!
Register Gallery All AlbumsBlogs Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar FAQ

E36 M3 (1992-1999) {Euro - S50 B32 321hp @ 7400 rpm} {U.S. - S52 B32 240 hp @ 6000 rpm}
Total Produced: 71,212 - Years Produced: 1992 to 1999

Like us on Facebook
M3forum Sponsor ListInterested in Becoming an M3forum sponsor?  Click here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 12:43:07 AM   #31
Modena NYC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
Reputation: 0 Modena NYC is on a distinguished road

United States




Default

Congrats. you'll be losing power. (where it counts)
Jump to top Modena NYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Register now and remove these ads
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 12:44:28 AM   #32
OahuMPower
:FACEPALM:
 
OahuMPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 26,504
Reputation: 0 OahuMPower is on a distinguished road
Location: San Diego

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Modena NYC View Post
Congrats. you'll be losing power.
tell that to my 240+ rwhp and 230 ft/lb dyno graph on stock cams
__________________
Jump to top OahuMPower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 12:52:14 AM   #33
Modena NYC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
Reputation: 0 Modena NYC is on a distinguished road

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OahuMPower View Post
tell that to my 240+ rwhp and 230 ft/lb dyno graph on stock cams
Peak hp is cheap.

I've run M50 cars several times (all with similar mods) and the result is always the same...pretty much neck and neck. So where is all that extra hp??? you lose it here, move it there...blah blah. 99% of the time, ripping on the street, or even at the track, exiting a turn at 4k rpm, TQ is what you want. We don't have high strung powerplants so making them behave that way is sort of silly. The M50 makes sense if you literally have a RACE CAR and actually RACE IT. If that is true, you'll have more aggressive cams and you'll be keeping the car above 4-5k rpm the whole time...Do you ever stop for a red light? Do you ever run errands? Do you ever get stuck in traffic? Do you ever get caught behind some lazy SUV in the left lane that won't move over? If you answer "yes" to any of these questions the M50 is not your friend. It does sound good though, I'll give you that.
Jump to top Modena NYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 12:58:10 AM   #34
OahuMPower
:FACEPALM:
 
OahuMPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 26,504
Reputation: 0 OahuMPower is on a distinguished road
Location: San Diego

United States




Default

haha.... let me know what your M52 dyno's ft/lb torque #'s are...

I do track my car regularly, and yes, it doesnt see anything lower than 4K usually when I'm at a track weekend. I have a DD for "normal" everyday stuff...
__________________
Jump to top OahuMPower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 01:03:43 AM   #35
I3MW
Registered User
 
I3MW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 361
Reputation: 0 I3MW is on a distinguished road

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Modena NYC View Post
Peak hp is cheap.

I've run M50 cars several times (all with similar mods) and the result is always the same...pretty much neck and neck. So where is all that extra hp??? you lose it here, move it there...blah blah. 99% of the time, ripping on the street, or even at the track, exiting a turn at 4k rpm, TQ is what you want. We don't have high strung powerplants so making them behave that way is sort of silly. The M50 makes sense if you literally have a RACE CAR and actually RACE IT. If that is true, you'll have more aggressive cams and you'll be keeping the car above 4-5k rpm the whole time...Do you ever stop for a red light? Do you ever run errands? Do you ever get stuck in traffic? Do you ever get caught behind some lazy SUV in the left lane that won't move over? If you answer "yes" to any of these questions the M50 is not your friend. It does sound good though, I'll give you that.
I've seen his dyno graph and its nothing for you to get smug about. As for your neck and neck stories great, I have similar stories with different endings. There is clearly extra HP its not rocket science; you now have a stroked s50 to 3.2 liters. But don't get me wrong I am a torque guy, I just feel it is better to shift that number up and make more with same. But keep telling yourself you need those extra foot pounds of torque while going shopping. Finally I'm not the first to say it but all the mods must compliment each other, if you have an ltw flywheel and a manifold that flows more, you will be revving significantly faster and applied to our cars in NA form I feel this is always a good thing. You don't need cams to make the M50 effective you just need to push the redline back a bit. The shift points on our cars were not ideal anyway the more restrictive manifold just covered it up better.
__________________

Last edited by I3MW; Sun, Aug-16-2009 at 01:10:27 AM.
Jump to top I3MW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 02:50:39 AM   #36
WRXEATR
The Frugal and Outspoken One
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Age: 26
Posts: 2,573
Reputation: 0 WRXEATR is on a distinguished road
Location: Orlando (Metro West), FL

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Modena NYC View Post
Congrats. you'll be losing power. (where it counts)
Naysayer.

Think about what you just said.

The only time im going to even be in the lower RPM range (where the torque is lost) in a spirited drive is when I begin your accelerate in first gear. If I shift near redline in 1st, ill be over 4000rpm when I make it into second. Just about the same applies to the rest of the gears on upwards. So, because the benefits of the m50 manifold are reaped where higher volumes of airflow are present, this is going to help me WAY more than its going to hurt me. The torque loss from the m50 manifold is mostly below 3000rpm, and the only time I shift at low RPM points like that is when I'm just out lazy driving, in which case I don't really need the increased airflow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Modena NYC View Post
Peak hp is cheap.
Do you ever get stuck in traffic? Do you ever get caught behind some lazy SUV in the left lane that won't move over? If you answer "yes" to any of these questions the M50 is not your friend.

If im stuck behind an SUV in the left lane @ 60mph in 5th, and I down shift into 3rd to pass him, I am right at 4000+ rpm where the larger volume runners of the M50 are beneficial. So actually, in this case M50=my friend. I don't need 4000rpm+ to run errands or be stuck in traffic, so I am fine with a small amount of lost torque in that respect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Modena NYC View Post
Peak hp is cheap.

I've run M50 cars several times (all with similar mods) and the result is always the same...pretty much neck and neck. So where is all that extra hp??? you lose it here, move it there...blah blah. 99% of the time, ripping on the street, or even at the track, exiting a turn at 4k rpm, TQ is what you want. We don't have high strung powerplants so making them behave that way is sort of silly. The M50 makes sense if you literally have a RACE CAR and actually RACE IT. If that is true, you'll have more aggressive cams and you'll be keeping the car above 4-5k rpm the whole time...Do you ever stop for a red light? Do you ever run errands? Do you ever get stuck in traffic? Do you ever get caught behind some lazy SUV in the left lane that won't move over? If you answer "yes" to any of these questions the M50 is not your friend. It does sound good though, I'll give you that.
Oh boy. Here we go again...

Last edited by WRXEATR; Sun, Aug-16-2009 at 02:59:13 AM.
Jump to top WRXEATR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 12:56:57 PM   #37
Aaron 4.6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 315
Reputation: 0 Aaron 4.6 is on a distinguished road





Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Modena NYC View Post
Congrats. you'll be losing power. (where it counts)
The intent of your post eludes me. This issue has been well discussed. The M50 manifold changes the shape of the torque curve.

Why did you feel the need to hate on what someone else chooses to do to their car, given that it cannot possibly impact the overall perception of M3 owners? Neon underbody lights or an aluminum wing, I'd understand you hating on. But a manifold swap?
Jump to top Aaron 4.6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 01:28:20 PM   #38
WRXEATR
The Frugal and Outspoken One
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Age: 26
Posts: 2,573
Reputation: 0 WRXEATR is on a distinguished road
Location: Orlando (Metro West), FL

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron 4.6 View Post
The intent of your post eludes me. This issue has been well discussed. The M50 manifold changes the shape of the torque curve.
Quoted for truth. Power is not "lost" it is simply "relocated" ever so conveniently into the rpm range that I'm typically driving in when im feelin good....!
Jump to top WRXEATR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 01:49:38 PM   #39
fiveightandten
He'll save children, but not the British children...
 
fiveightandten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,699
In the garage:
Reputation: 0 fiveightandten will become famous soon enough
Location: Connecticut

United States




Default

Just to reiterate...

Buy a kit (whether it be Eric's, the Eurosport or the Bimmerworld) is totally worth it, especially Eric's kit seeing as it's the cheapest. You definitely don't want to be trying to fabricate vacuum piping, finding hoses and connectors that are fuel/oil resistant and will hold up to the negative pressure of the vacuum involved, piecing things together, making measurements, etc. Then after you're done, bolting it all back together and praying you don't have to take it apart all over again because of some unforseen problem with the design of your modification.

Just spend the money on a kit. It's been researched, and implemented over and over again and you know you won't have issues as long as it's been installed correctly.

And without adding fuel to the fire...drive an M50 modded car before you put the manifold in yours. It's not for everyone. Like any mod, there are pros and cons. If it was all pros, the car would've come like that from the factory.
__________________
-Nick
Jump to top fiveightandten is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Sun, Aug-16-2009, 06:28:18 PM   #40
Modena NYC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
Reputation: 0 Modena NYC is on a distinguished road

United States




Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OahuMPower View Post
haha.... let me know what your M52 dyno's ft/lb torque #'s are...

I do track my car regularly, and yes, it doesnt see anything lower than 4K usually when I'm at a track weekend. I have a DD for "normal" everyday stuff...
Exactly - you hop in the car when you are going to go ROMP and RIP around or on your way to the track etc. Fine.

I love how some poeple call it "hating" when I'm trying to keep people from spending $ they don't need to.

I disagree that shifting below 4k RPM is "lugging" it - i OFTEN shift below 4k, some times before 3k. If my wife is in the car, the car has enough oomph, no need to run it hard - now when i take it to the track - that is a different story. But what am I going to do? Put a M50 mani, + the software and tuning required to make it work decently, and slap on a coilover kit which everyone loves just for 4 days out of the year????

I've had a E36 more or less since '03, I've done the coils on a daily driven car and its doable but not livable IMO. I've driven/raced M50 mani cars and again, its doable, but not livable IMO. Just trying to balance out the "M50 mani is god propaganda" with some mature, life learned lessons.....to each his own at the end of the day.

Props to those willing to help and aid a fellow board member in this endeavor however
Jump to top Modena NYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
give, hand, install, local, m50, mani, wanna

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
M3Forum.com and M3forum.net is in no way sponsored, endorsed or affiliated by or with BMW NA / BMW AG or any of it's subsidiaries or vendors.
BMW and M3 (E90 M3 | E92 M3 | E93 M3 | E46 M3 | E36 M3 | E30 M3) are registered trademarks of BMW AG.
M3Forum Terms of Service
Copyright ©1999-2012 M3Forum.com
One of the largest message boards on the web !
Discussing Does someone local wanna give me a hand with an M50 Mani install? in the E36 M3 (1992-1999) Forum - {Euro - S50 B32 321hp @ 7400 rpm} {U.S. - S52 B32 240 hp @ 6000 rpm}
Total Produced: 71,212 - Years Produced: 1992 to 1999 at BMW M3 Forum.com (E30 M3 | E36 M3 | E46 M3 | E92 M3 | F80/X)