![]() |
|
Loading
|
Mobile M3forum |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
| Off Topic Place to discuss this and that. Note: We also have "request to join" forums: Guns and Fitness. (Threads/posts inside may contain material that is NSFW / offensive) |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 32,430
Reputation: 766
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Location: PA & MD
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Pale Geek Rigour
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,631
Reputation: 103
![]() ![]() Location: MD/C
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Great article though. 0-60 in 5.2 and the high-13s quarter sounds tame by today's standards, but this was ridiculous in the late 60s. Wonder what it'd do with some proper rubber.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
|
Some better tires/wheels, brakes and some suspension tweaking and it would be a beast.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 317
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Gainesville
![]() |
I'd love to get my hands on an all-aluminum 427
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
2012 Formula 1 Game Champion!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 30
Posts: 14,781
In the garage:
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Behind the Orange Curtain, Crapifornia
![]() |
Wow...What cost $7806 in 1969 would cost $45349.17 in 2008.
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 1969, camaro, road, test, zl1 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|