![]() |
|
Loading
|
Mobile M3forum |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
| E46 M3 (2001-2006) Engine: S54 - Max Hp: 333 hp at 7,900 rpm / 262 lb/ft at 4,900 rpm Total Produced: 45,000+ - Years Produced: 2001 to 2006. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Search Nazi
|
So, got the Race version of the Shark Injector from Tuner MS. Installed it just a little bit ago and these are my thoughts on it:
1: Not mind numbing results HOWEVER it is a huge improvement over what I had which was AA headers with BMW software. Long story... 2: Instructions were followed exactly and had ZERO issues installing it. 3: The instructions called for at least a 20amp charger however I used a 15amp and worked fine 4: Took a total of about 30 minutes to finish and my SES light is no longer there (which has been for about 3 months now since BMW put their software on my M). That alone is a nice result from this upgrade. Overall, the idle is smoother and my start up is no longer "hunting" which is a great feeling. Right away, I noticed a crispness to the throttle response and an overall smoothness to the idle. If I can describe it, it would be like something in between having sport mode off and on. I am pleased. If you don't want to dish out the money on an ESS tune, I would recommend the Shark. I am happy. If you have any questions, let me know.
__________________
Lords of M3Forum official member |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
YNWA
|
Do we know what the average, real world hp/tq differences are between the two softwares?
__________________
2004 SilberGrau M3 Coupe 6MT
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Reputation: 0
![]() ![]() |
When you get misfires, or problems with the VANOS , let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
YNWA
|
Oh you can't leave this treasure here without an explanation. Pray tell.
__________________
2004 SilberGrau M3 Coupe 6MT
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Undercover Mod
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,966
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Dallas
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,126
Reputation: 0
![]() Location: Vancouver
![]() |
legitimate question but, 10 years after the car has come to market basically maxed out from the factory, I doubt one shelf software is significantly better than another powerwise
__________________
TCK SA 500/600, TCK RCAs, 3.91, GC front sway, Evosport headers, Powerchip, Milltek, 18"Volk RE30, UUC SSK, Optima Red |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
YNWA
|
That's why I ask. Others say the $200-250 difference is worth it; I'm wondering why. Perhaps its because of factors other than pure hp numbers.
__________________
2004 SilberGrau M3 Coupe 6MT
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Search Nazi
|
Yea, for me I was looking to get rid of the CES light, smooth out the idle, and improve throttle response. The shark did all this. I wasn't looking for HP gains. If there are a couple thrown in for good measure then I am not complaining.
__________________
Lords of M3Forum official member Last edited by zerotosixty; Sun, Nov-21-2010 at 03:25:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Search Nazi
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Lords of M3Forum official member |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Reputation: 0
![]() ![]() |
HA ok ladies that were talkin SH**...bascially ever since i had the shark injector installed it messed with my vanos, soleniod was that failure.
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| injector, shark |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|